Health Law Matters
|
|
| |
| |
EMTALA: WHAT NON-EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT PHYSICIANS NEED
TO KNOW
|
| |
| By Steven K. Sanborn, Mitchell Warner, P.A.
|
| |
 |
| |
| |
| Most ER physicians have a working knowledge of the requirements
imposed by the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act
("EMTALA"). However, EMTALA's reach carries beyond the emergency
room. Physicians who provide call coverage to hospitals need to be
aware of EMTALA's requirements and how to avoid liability. And for
those physicians who do not provide call coverage, you may be
required to do so if there is no other coverage for your specialty
at the hospital. |
| |
| EMTALA prohibits hospitals with emergency departments from
"patient dumping." Generally, EMTALA requires hospitals participating
in Medicare to provide medical screening examinations for all persons
who present at the ER and request service, regardless of that
person's ability to pay. In fact, the hospital cannot delay
providing a medical screening examination in order to inquire
about a person's method of payment, or in order to get authorization
from a managed care plan. If the person has an emergency medical
condition, or if a pregnant woman is in labor, the hospital must
treat or stabilize the person, or provide for an "appropriate"
transfer to another facility. |
| |
| The Health Care Financing Administration ("HCFA") has promulgated
regulations that require hospitals to provide the same physicians'
services to patients presenting at the emergency room as are provided
to other hospitalized patients. Hospitals are required to maintain
lists of physicians on-call who can provide further evaluation or
stabilizing treatment to a patient with an emergency medical condition.
Although this does not require specialists to be on-call at all times,
it does require hospitals to establish policies and procedures for
when a particular speciality is not available. As an on-call
physician, the physician is acting in the capacity of an agent of
the hospital, and is not representing his or her own practice. |
| |
| Physicians on call are required to respond within a reasonable
period of time, which in normal circumstances should be no more
than thirty minutes. This is the case even if a physician is busy
in the OR with an elective surgery. Furthermore, physicians who are
on-call at their offices must come to the hospital to examine the
patient with an emergency condition; it is unacceptable for the
hospital to send the patient to the physician's office, unless
the physician's office is on land owned by, and contiguous to, the
hospital or on the hospital campus. |
| |
| Under HCFA's interpretation, EMTALA is also implicated where a
patient presents to a hospital owned facility or physician's office
that uses the hospital's Medicare provider number. Thus, a physician
in a hospital owned practice may be required to provide medical
screening exams for patients who present at their office. |
| |
| Some courts have held that EMTALA even applies to inpatients.
Thus, physicians cannot discharge an inpatient who is not
stabilized, regardless of whether the patient was admitted via the
emergency department. |
| |
| A hospital may transfer a patient only if a patient, or his or
her authorized representative, requests the transfer, or a physician
certifies that the benefits of a transfer outweighs the risks to the
patient of remaining in the facility.In the latter situation, a
physician must sign a certificate that explains how, based upon the
information available at the time of transfer, the benefits of
transfer outweigh the risks.
|
| |
| Another issue involves "reverse dumping." If a hospital with
limited facilities legitimately attempts to transfer a patient to
a hospital with specialized capabilities, the receiving hospital
could face liability if it refuses to accept the transfer. Thus,
the hospital may require an on-call physician to accept the
patient. Again, the on-call physician cannot refuse to accept a
patient while waiting for authorization from a managed care plan,
or on the basis that the physician does not have a contract with
the managed care plan. |
| |
| All a physician's liability may be imputed to the hospital, the
physician himself or herself may also be subject to civil monetary
penalties of up to $50,000 per inappropriate transfer. Also a
physician may be excluded from Medicare and Medicaid based upon
an EMTALA violation. A hospital that does not impose discipline
against a physician may itself be subject to penalties, including
exclusion from Medicare. |
| |
| A physician may be subject to penalties for: |
| |
- knowingly signing a transfer form where the physician knew
or should have known that the benefits did not outweigh the risks;
- intentionally misrepresenting an individual's condition or
other information, including a hospital's obligations under EMTALA;
- as an on-call physician, refusing to appear within a reasonable
period of time, resulting in a transfer of the patient to another
facility.
|
| In Inspector General v. Cherukuri, an Administrative Law
Judge imposed two $50,000 fines upon an on-call surgeon. These
violations stemmed from two automobile accident patients, each of
whom were identified to have head injuries and abdominal bleeding.
Rather than treat the injuries, the judge found that the surgeon
improperly transferred the patients to a tertiary care facility.
(The surgeon alleged that the anesthesiologist refused to
anesthetize patients with head injuries). Specifically, the judge
found that the surgeon had:
|
| |
- failed to provide medical treatment that was within the
hospital's capacity;
- failed to obtain the receiving hospital's approval for
the transfer, although he led the ER nurses to believe he had;
- directed the nurses to prepare the patients for transfer,
although he refused to sign the form certifying that the benefits
outweighed the risks; and
- not explained the hospital's EMTALA obligation to the
patients' families.
|
| While the Administrative Law Judge's decision was overturned on
appeal, it still raises significant concerns for physicians who
provide call coverage at hospitals. |
| |
| To conclude, we strongly advise both emergency room and on-call
physicians to learn and understand EMTALA's requirements. Medical
Staffs need to work with their hospitals to formulate acceptable
screening, transfer and discharge policies that comply with EMTALA.
Otherwise, physicians could be subject to considerable fines,
exclusion, loss of privileges, and even indemnification actions from
their own hospitals. |
| |
| |
| |
 |
| |
|
|
| |
Copyright © 2006 - Mitchell Warner, P.A. |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
The Medical Law Alert is a publication of the
Mitchell Warner
Health Law Group. Its purpose is to provide general information about significant
legal developments, and should not be construed as legal advice on specific
factual scenarios. For more information on the issues discussed in this
publication, please contact Edward E. Hollowell
at (800) 662-7403 or ehollowell@nchealthlaw.com |
| |
|
 |
 |
|